Having
a family history of prostate cancer among first-degree relatives may
increase a woman’s risk of developing breast cancer. That is the
conclusion of a new study published early online in CANCER,
a peer-reviewed journal of the American Cancer Society. The study’s
results indicate that clinicians should take a complete family history
of all cancers—even those in family members of the opposite sex—to help
assess a patient’s risk of developing cancer.
Evidence
suggests that the risk of developing breast and prostate cancer is
increased among individuals with a family history of the same disease,
particularly among first-degree relatives. However, less is known about
the relationship between breast and prostate cancer within families.
To
investigate, Jennifer L. Beebe-Dimmer, PhD, MPH, of the Barbara Ann
Karmanos Cancer Institute and Wayne State University School of Medicine
in Detroit, studied 78,171 women who enrolled in the Women’s Health
Initiative Observational Study between 1993 and 1998 and were free of
breast cancer at the start of the study. During follow-up, which ended
in 2009, a total of 3506 breast cancer cases were diagnosed. The
researchers found that a family history of prostate cancer in
first-degree relatives (fathers, brothers, and sons) was linked with a
14 percent increase in breast cancer risk for women, after adjusting for
various patient factors. In separate analyses examining the joint
impact of both cancers, a family history of both breast and prostate
cancer was linked with a 78 percent increase in breast cancer risk.
Risks associated with a family history of both breast and prostate
cancer were higher among African American women than white women.
“The
increase in breast cancer risk associated with having a positive family
history of prostate cancer is modest; however, women with a family
history of both breast and prostate cancer among first-degree relatives
have an almost 2-fold increase in risk of breast cancer,” said Dr.
Beebe-Dimmer.
Dr.
Beebe-Dimmer noted that patients and physicians may not consider
certain cancer diagnoses among family members, especially those in
members of the opposite sex, in their assessments of cancer risk. “These
findings are important in that they can be used to support an approach
by clinicians to collect a complete family history of all
cancers—particularly among first degree relatives—in order to assess
patient risk for developing cancer,” she said. “Families with clustering
of different tumors may be particularly important to study in order to
discover new genetic mutations to explain this clustering.”
No comments:
Post a Comment